Skip to main content

How to Remove Context without affecting the Story in MBA Application Essays?

Welcome to F1GMAT’s #AskAtulJose series. Today’s question is a common dilemma that applicants face once they iterate through their essays a few times. The question is:

Q) I have put a lot of thought into the essay by working on the story, the transitions and feel that the final essay is heartfelt and impactful. But the problem is that the word count is 200 words over the 500-word limit. I really couldn’t shorten the essay. How should I start editing?

Editing is a skill that cannot be condensed in one book or even a Q&A like this, but from experience, I found some quick hacks that could be used to improve the narrative.

The first place that you really have to look into is the secondary facts or background information.

When you start the draft, the words will flow, and if you have read our Winning MBA Essay Guide, I have also suggested not to self-censor and write freely. So when you write without any hesitation about an event or events leading up to a pivotal part of your life or career, you will capture a lot of secondary information in the form of dialogues, interactions, names, description, and even the technology or a concept unique to your industry.

If you remove close to 65 to 75% of the background information, the essay will read poorly.

There is, however, a balancing act where you can remove 35% of the background information, and you barely would see any difference. This requires an independent eye, and that is why you have a lot of editing services like what F1GMAT is offering.

But I will try to explain with an example that I have used in Winning MBA Essay Guide’s Chapter “10 Rules to Fight Wordiness.”

In this example, the applicant – a software engineer, writes about a coding marathon when the client deadline was near. It goes like this:

"The 3-member team pushed through a non-stop 48-hour coding Marathon, fixing the bugs, sleeping in our conference room with a make-shift 3x5 feet single bed, and strategically used the sleep time to meet the 1st Aug deadline."

Ok.

You might have immediately found a lot of background information that, on the first read, looks important, but we can let go.

What are the primary facts in that sentence?

The primary facts are determined by the relevance of the information in understanding the constraints that an applicant faced. So if you look into the sentence, the primary facts are



Primary Facts

• 3-member team
• 48-hour

Why 3-member team:
It shows the team size – a data point that the admissions team would look into for evaluating his leadership skills.

Why 48-hour deadline: It shows the constraint that the applicant faced and his ability to achieve goals under pressure.

Don’t remove the primary facts while editing. It has a purpose.

Now, what are the secondary facts?

3x5 feet in 3x5 feet single bed

When you mention a single bed, the reader can infer that the bed is of relatively smaller size. The 3x5 is unnecessary for the MBA Application essay, although it would read well in a novel.

1st August in the phrase 1st August deadline

Although mentioning the deadline is important, the date doesn’t serve any purpose other than offering a certain rhythm to the sentence. So if I read the unedited paragraph again, it goes like this:

"The 3-member team pushed through a non-stop 48-hour coding Marathon, fixing the bugs, sleeping in our conference room with a make-shift 3x5 feet single bed, and strategically used the sleep time to meet the 1st Aug deadline."


If I remove 3x5 feet and 1st August and read it again, how will it sound?

"The 3-member team pushed through a non-stop 48-hour coding Marathon, fixing the bugs, sleeping in our conference room with a make-shift single bed, and strategically used the sleep time to meet the deadline."


It barely made any difference. There are hundreds of such decisions that an editor makes.

If you need my help in editing your essays, subscribe to F1GMAT’s Essay Review Service



Atul Jose F1GMAT's FounderAbout the Author 

I am Atul Jose, Founding Consultant of F1GMAT, an MBA admissions consultancy that has worked with applicants since 2009.

For the past 15 years I have edited the application files of admits to the M7 programs: Harvard Business School, Stanford Graduate School of Business, the Wharton School, MIT Sloan, Chicago Booth, Kellogg School of Management, and Columbia Business School, together with admits to Berkeley Haas, Yale School of Management, NYU Stern, Michigan Ross, Duke Fuqua, Darden, Tuck, IMD, London Business School, INSEAD, SDA Bocconi, IESE Business School, HEC Paris, McCombs, and Tepper, plus other programs inside the global top 30.

 

My work covers the full MBA application deliverable: career planning and profile evaluation, application essay editing, recommendation letter editing, mock interviews and interview preparation, scholarship and fellowship essay editing, and cover letter editing for funding applications. Full bio with credentials and admit history is here.

 

I am the author of the Winning MBA Essay Guide, the best-selling essay guide covering M7 MBA programs. I have written and updated the guide annually since 2013, which makes the 2026 edition the thirteenth.

 

The reason I still write and edit essays every cycle: a good MBA essay carries a real applicant's voice. Writing essays for F1GMAT's Books and Editing essays weekly is how I stay calibrated to what current admissions committees respond to.

 

Contact me for school selection, career planning, essay strategy, narrative development, essay editing, interview preparation, scholarship essay editing, or guidance documents for recommendation letters.