First Section: The applicant starts with an interesting experience of working with two contrasting experiences. One working for a CEO, who was bold and took on the competitors with zest, and the other who kept a low-profile but worked on the fundamentals and the strategic goals. The difference in outcome is cited as a motivation for leadership development.

Second Section: Stanford’s leadership courses, labs and the unique skills of recognizing intention is mentioned as vital for making deals.

Third Section: An example from the applicant’s career where he showed vulnerability and the mentorship he received is cited as a moment of clarity. The applicant cites a Stanford professor in PE for his unique background and the lessons he expects to receive from the practitioner.

Fourth Section: The fourth section is tied to Finance and the specific value the applicant would receive from the courses in the academic area.

If you need assistance, subscribe to F1GMAT’s Stanford All in One Review Service

X declared bankruptcy and Y is on a path to lead the telecom market. Leadership made the difference.