Business School Ranking is tricky, and for publications, the evaluation is based on feedback from Alumni, Current Students, Professors, and Recruiters. Biases emerge from different actors in management education. The result is a concocted list with a high margin of error. Historical ranking plays a major role in maintaining status quo. Are you saying that Harvard, Stanford and Wharton remain the only top three schools offering world class education? There are at least four more equal or better schools that are not even featured in the top 10 list.
But the ranking is not based on an independent review but through the response from Alma matter and the beneficiary – the Recruiter. When you look closer, the response rates are as low as 20-25%. Such low numbers should not influence the opinions of future MBAs, who will use the ranking information as the basis for their belief. Schools featuring in the top 20 list will spread the news furthest, and those who are not featured in top 50 will use some other dubious factors like top 10 MBA in London or "Top 10 MBA near a beach", or an appropriate list where the ranking is below 10.
An unbiased observer might imagine that such distortion of ranking will find no takers but from the recent chats that we had with MBA aspirants, we found that they take the data as “Holy” information – data that should not be questioned. We cannot blame MBA aspirants. We hold on to irrational beliefs in our daily lives. Questioning data validity is a highly intellectual exercise that requires less distraction and more deliberation. In our world, both are in short supply. Once our basic beliefs are set, it becomes impossible to evaluate evidence to the contrary.
When you talk to alumni and current student who are not that thrilled with the program, the question that will come to you mind is “Has the guy lost it? Maybe he got his priorities wrong. Perhaps he is a creative type not cut out for an MBA.” At no point in our list of assumptions, do we concur to the evidence revealed by the current student. Perhaps, the so-called great MBA programs have professors in key subject expertise who are plain boring, and you would have learned the subject on your own.
The Admission process helps MBA programs attract some of the best minds, and credit is due for the relentless AdCom that make sure that the best and diverse minds occupy the classroom. What result are symbiotic conversations led by the dominant class members, and often the best experiences are the result of such interactions. The professors play a supportive role. Perhaps MBAs want such experiences but majority of them are in the class as career switchers. For such a large group, a structure on how to develop the new skills is essential more than the haphazard manner in which ideas are shared. But will any MBA student share such disadvantages. In our experience - Yes! They do.
Most Alumni from top MBA programs say in private that they would have reached their short-term goals without an MBA, but the network that they developed during the program is too valuable to be disturbed with honest opinions, and so they pretend. The returns are high when a group of talented Alumni share competitive information, and support each other. The externalities of an MBA – networking and brand value are what make them stay in the top. The course curriculum and professors are good, but the consistency of quality lacks in top 5 MBA programs. If the classroom experience for you means networking and sharing ideas, follow the Business School rankings.
For others, evaluate the program based on a combination of learning experiences (in-class learning via professors and classroom experience via classmates), post-MBA salary, post-MBA job mobility, and reputation among recruiters over 5 years after an MBA. After you reach your short-term goals, it is your ability to maneuver business strategies and personalities that would decide whether you can reach your long-term goals. An MBA alone is not enough.
2018 MBA Research Guide - Choose your MBA
F1GMAT's Comprehensive MBA Research Guide will teach you how to select MBA programs through a bottom-up approach.
Articulating your Post-MBA Goals and Career Path is the FIRST step. Which program will give you that hike in Salary, Switch in Career, Change in Location or Job Satisfaction?
We cover them all through our extensive analysis.
+ How to Choose the Best MBA Program: Factors to Consider
Define Post-MBA Goals
Pick your Path: Generalize or Specialize
Use Moral Algebra Method
Use Multi-Attribute Utility Theory
Understand the Top 5 Risks
Measure MBA Career Service Team's Effectiveness
Use Bookending to Calculate MBA Admission Chance
Use Net Present Value to Calculate MBA Return on Investment
Don't Fall for the Mere Exposure Effect
Best Practices to find the truth in MBA Information Session or MBA Tour
Comprehensive MBA Research Guide: Includes Top MBA Programs by 19 Specializations:
+ General Management
+ Operations Management
+ Supply Chain Management
+ Luxury Management
+ Information Systems
+ Hospitality Management
+ Leadership Development
+ Military &
+ Top MBA Program Ranking
Top 20 MBA Programs - Tuition Fee (2018)
Top 31 MBA Programs in United States – Total Cost & Salary (2017)
Top 60 MBA – GMAT and GPA (Average & Median)
Top 20 European MBA Programs - Tuition Fee, Total Cost & Salary
Top 20 European MBA Programs (Based on Actual Salary Increase)
Top 20 European MBA Programs (Short-term return on investment)
Top 20 Affordable European MBA Programs
Top 10 MBA in UK – Salary & Fee
Top MBA Destinations Based on Happiness Index
Top MBA Destinations based on Innovation Index
Top 10 MBA Job Markets based on Cost of living and Purchasing Power
Top MBA Destination: By Economy
+Comparisons - Top MBA Programs
Wharton vs. Columbia MBA
MIT vs. Stanford MBA
Haas vs. Ross MBA
Kellogg vs Ross MBA
Booth vs Wharton MBA
MIT Sloan vs Tuck MBA
IMD vs. INSEAD MBA
IIMA vs. ISB
Harvard vs. Stanford MBA
+ MBA in France
Top Industries in France
Top MBA Programs in France